Comparison of data sets: The table below lists correlation coefficients between log2(ratios) of all well measured genes for the indicated experiments. A cluster image comparing significant expression changes can be seen here.

snf2, YPD, C

1.00

snf2, YPD, D

0.87

1.00

swi1, YPD, C

0.86

0.82

1.00

swi1, YPD, D

0.77

0.76

0.78

1.00

snf2, min, C

0.58

0.61

0.58

0.54

1.00

snf2, min, D

0.61

0.63

0.60

0.54

0.84

1.00

swi1, min, C

0.58

0.63

0.61

0.56

0.84

0.86

1.00

swi1, min, D

0.53

0.57

0.53

0.49

0.79

0.82

0.84

1.00

1-1 *

0.55

0.53

0.52

0.48

0.42

0.46

0.43

0.42

1.00

2-2 *

0.57

0.55

0.54

0.48

0.43

0.47

0.45

0.43

0.73

1.00

1-2 *

0.54

0.52

0.51

0.47

0.42

0.45

0.42

0.41

0.87

0.84

1.00

2-1 *

0.58

0.55

0.55

0.50

0.44

0.47

0.45

0.43

0.85

0.88

0.73

1.00

snf2, YPD, C
snf2, YPD, D
swi1, YPD, C
swi1, YPD, D
snf2, min, C
snf2, min, D
swi1, min, C
swi1, min, D
1-1 *
2-2 *
1-2 *
2-1 *

* Data from the website of Holstege et al (1998), Cell 95:717 .They reported 2 independent measurements of absolute expression levels for a wild-type and a snf2 ATPase mutant strain. To enable comparison to microarray data which is expressed as a ratio, the expression level in each of the wild-type experiments was divided by the expression level in each of the mutant experiments to generate the 4 possible combinations.